Hello, DWI/DUI Defendant:

WELCOME to my website,... this website information is provided, purposely, here, for any DWI/DUI Defendant.   You can gain insight by my experiences going to courtrooms, all over the USA, for decades.  

My mission is to help you from getting RailRoaded for DWI/DUI alcohol or drugs, by the police, when you were not impaired, nor intoxicated. 

Not everybody is intoxicated at the 0.08% legal limit... drinking alcoholic beverages is TOO prevalent in the American society, for a long time, now ... you've heard ...he or she  was legally drunk, but not actually drunk.... yes, it makes GREAT sense to MIS-Convict a person at some reading at or above 0.08% BAC, when he or she was not drunk!   Nothing like MIS-Convicting a person via, essentionally, what is highly organized political collusion! 

The highest blood case that I helped to win in a court room was 0.32% BAC.... the highest breath case was 0.35% BrAC.

My name is Prof. Stan Broskey….I am a DEFENSIVE Forensic Scientist, which means by my own choice , I choose, forensically & scientifically, to help DWI/ DUI defendants, in their courtroom alcohol or drug arrest problems. I do not do the opposite testimony for any DA, prosecutor or AG, by my own choice [would one be MORE credible by also doing the exactly opposite testimony for DAs?    A double agent? , being two faced?] ,...no, in this country, we have Freedom of Choice in what one chooses to do.   The state's  "e-x-p-e-r-t" comes to BURY YOU, & NOT TO PRAISE YOU.  He or she is NOT a NEUTRAL PERSON, by any means.    When I worked for the NJ State Police, I was told  that if I helped out any defendant, in any way, in any NJ court,...that  I would be, immediately, fired, period.   NO ands, ifs, or buts!        

The ONLY thing that YOU were Obliged-To-Do, is to provide: a breath sample {Appreciable Error[s] can be involved against you},... OR a blood sample {Appreciable Error[s] can also be involved against you},... OR a urine sample [Appreciable, uncompensated Error[s] can be involved against you], …if the policeman asks you for any of these bio-samples from you.

Doing the roadside Standard Field Sobriety Tests, SFSTs, were done ALL, VOLUNTARILY, on YOUR part…. it was best that YOU did NOT do them, for most drivers are apt to fail them,... even when they were TOTALLY Sober. For example, you are not apt to do them, correctly, when you are under Stress, &/or because of  some health problem, &/or from body function problem.   I can help you with your courtroom SFST & its DWI/DUI scientific/ forensic defense.   FORENSIC Toxicology is a study of how people react to their alcohol or drug intake.

About the alleged, observed DWI/DUI symptom[s] that the police officer cited on you:  the cop has not spent one day in a medical school,…. but he is allowed ‘to play M.D.’ on you… more often than not, he will enumerate symptoms supposedly for DWI that can be attributed to a non-alcoholic or to a non-drug intake causation in you.
If this was a motor vehicle accident, the trauma involved in a vehicular crash can mislead a lot of police to cite you, wrongly, for DWI/DUI. A police officer in the US of A can get EXTRA money for his DWI/DUI arrests &/or convictions, & YOU CAN GET VICTIMIZED by this…. BEWARE! Due to this EXTRA, INCENTIVE $, the cop can be BIASED against you, from the get-go of your carstop, due to a  REAL modern day, potential 'conflict of interest' [ extra $ for DWI/DUI]  to police, allowed to exist by the courts... in some states, , e.g. New Jersey, the NJ judge collects this EXTRA,  INCENTIVE $, & it goes back to his police members !    Breath test devices can be easily manipulated, and ALL breathtest devices are wrongly programmed that 'Everybody is the Same', which is not true to what is known in Real Science, ...& due to these,  uncompensated  errors against YOU, this will get you easily cited for DWI/DUI, when that was not so.  People can vary a lot.... governments  do not compensate for this human variation that, potentially, was in you.... breath test devices all operate  that Everybody is the Same .... even 5th graders know that Everybody is NOT the Same.     So, who is dumber than a 5th grader?

The DWI Law states that Everybody is intoxicated at 0.08% .... by collusion, they have created this Myth or BIG Lie. This is not so ... many people are quite Tolerant by my observations &/or by my testing on them to their alcoholic beverage intake  or their drug intake.  They had drunk, so often, [ & it does not have to be excessively] over the years that it does not affect them, any more.   Others have taken the drug, so many times, that  it has little effect on them.
Jury members know the principle that when you take a drug ,.... it, often, has less effect on you.

Many carstoppees, while under a lot of stress, can say, TOO much, to the officer; not realizing that it is THEIR U.S. Right to KEEP Quiet.  The only thing you had to do was to identify yourself, period .  Under these stressful carstop circuimstances , you were apt to say something wrong.

About allowing yourself to be examined by a police Drug Recognition "E-x-p-e-r-t": a DR"E", can easily lead to YOU being Mis-cited/Mis-convicted & VICTIMIZED by this  for DWI/DUI Drug Use, when it was NOT so.  It would have been better for your courtroom case that you did NOT cooperate with the DR'E'… the DR'E' is NOT a scientist by any stretch of one's imagination,... he is NOT a medical expert…he is only a policeman with a 54 hour course on how to implicate you on drug use, ...has no REAL background in either science, nor in medicine. The only thing that you have to do is provide him with a urine, & a breath test sample. It would have been better to not answer any of his questions .  Refuse to cooperate with this pseudo-scientist.    However, IF you did allow him to exam you, I can still help you out, forensically & scientifically,  with your anti-DR'E' defense. A DR'E' can get EXTRA, INCENTIVE  $ for his drug arrests, which could very well be a REAL 'conflict of interest'...So, BEWARE!   Don't get DR'E' VICTIMIZED.

My e-mail box is drsjb@verizon.net

Prof. Stan Broskey, DEFENSIVE FORENSIC SCIENTIST... This is MY 51st YEAR, doing what I do, as a bio-analytical-scientist.