Hello...Welcome to my Defensive Orientated Website:

My name is Professor Stanley J. Broskey,    I am a   
d-e-f-e-n-s-i-v-e forensic scientist.    I help out in court cases involving alcohol & drug charges, & there is a LOT of need in these areas, due to, too often, the Legal Limits set are based on just mere politics, & do not reflect what, actually, happens in humans.  For  many decades, now, I have been a bio-analytical/ forensic  chemist & forensic  toxicologist.  I am known, nationwide.   

But nationwide, about 1.5 million drivers are arrested, annually , for DWI or DUI  from alcohol or from drug intake, & this would amount to at least $50 Million DWI fines, but this deceiving, since many States, also, gleefully, tack on DWI/DUI Surcharges & other multiple fines to fatten up their State's coffers, & to give EXTRA $ to police which this EXTRA $ to police can help, greatly, to mis-convict you by being a real, modern day 'Conflict of Interest" .   Carstop arrests for DWI arrests for one's alcohol or drug intake is a  HUGE Business for police & for courts.     If a policeman gets Extra $ for this,... this $ could easily cause him to mis-testify in a manner that will, surely, cause a DWI mis-conviction on YOU,... many police DVDs or videotapes  of the carstops do not reflect what was written on the DWI police report.... many of the DWI symptoms indicated by the cop are not on the police DVD or videotape!    In a lot of my cases, no police videotape was used.  The police did not want to use a videocamera.... it would work against their courtroom testimony.

Many drivers would not be inebriated at the present day 0.08% BAC LEGAL LIMIT due to their life long Acquired Tolerance.   The DWI Law is often based on mere Politics & not on REAL bio-Science.   My courtroom defensive help is based on REAL science, & not on political fantasies, or even more sinister , a political Hoaxes.     When the legal cut off was set at 0.15% BAC, I was able to, easily, show that many individuals, by my direct experimentation  on them,with 151 rum,... that they  were not intoxicated, well over the 0.15% Legal Limit... so too, this was easily shown  when the Legal Limit was set at  0.10 % BAC.     The human body has not changed at all, in the interim , & therefore, many  drivers would be not inebriated well over the limit set, currently, at 0.08% BAC. If the Basic Political Premise is wrong, namely,: "Everybody is drunk at 0.08 % BAC", ...then, the legal outcome would be wrong for many drivers, who were tolerant to their alcoholic drink  &/or drug intake.   Gee, it is really very Ethical & VERY Moral to convict a person to be legally drunk, when he or she was not, actually, drunk!   Due to this, in Dram Shop cases, a person, well over current Legal Limits, could walk into a bar & not appear to be drunk to an experienced bartender &/or doorman, when he or she was well over the Legal Limit.   Tolerance can be found in many legal or in many medical dictionaries.

MADD wants  the  Legal Limit to be set at 0.05% or at 0.04 %BAC ... this would cause many more drivers in the USA  to be mis-convicted for DWI/DUI.

Breathtesting devices, also, have always been manufacturered that "Everybody is the Same"BS ... if that was true, a medical student would only have to study, one day, in medical school.   These indirect breath devices do not adjust for the normal & widespread variation that appears in the human population,... as if we were still in the Dark Ages ... no, we are in the Golden Age of Science & not in  the Dark Ages....DNA varies greatly ...fingerprints vary greatly , blood varies greatly, etc.... & many are being DWI /
DUI misconvicted , nationwide, each year over the Gross Stupidity of: "EVERYBODY is the SAME, politics in effect.  Where is the blood in breath testing?   In blood alcohol, you test blood...in urine alcohol , you test urine...in breathtesting, you test breath, not blood.   Many breath device manufacturers will only sell their devices to police...for they have a lot to hide!   In real science, there is no such thing as secrecy in REAL Science..., but it does exist & flourishes in political pseudo-"science". 

In the photo of me above , I am holding a breath test device "Simulator".... do you think that this "Simulator"  duplicates the human lung?  If you do, you are not in tune with what occurs in many humans.    

Here are some of the items that I, forensically, help out with: 
*The effects of alcohol &/or drugs in tolerant drivers...        
*Dram Shop Litigation Forensic Help...
*Expert Evaluation of roadside SFSTests & police videotape/ DVD  documentation...
*Defensive Forensic attacks on police breathtesting...breathtest devices are not real, scientific instrumentation...
*Evaluation of laboratory methodology & results on blood or urine or saliva alcohol &/or drug assays...
*Retrograde Calculations of alcohol or drug results...
*Drug or alcohol testing at the workplace...
* Evaluations of Medical Examiner's Postmortem Toxicology assays or their conclusions...
* Contra police Drug Recognition "Expert" or DR"E" 's testimony...
*Evaluations of so called "INDEPENDENT" laboratory assays for the DA, Prosecutor, or AG Offices.  Many so called "independent" labs are not really independent laboratories.
My e-mail box is:    profstanbroskey@comcast.net