Hello, DWI/DUI Defendants:

WELCOME to my website,... this website information is provided, purposely, here, for any DWI/DUI Defendant.

When one starts to drink alcoholic beverages in one's life , for most people after about the 3rd bout with alcohol intake , one does not have to kneel infront of a toilet, retching, anymore, for the body, then, knows how to get rid of  the alcohol, & you are well on the road  in becoming tolerant to the affects of your alcoholic intake .  You have left the 'Joe Amateur' status & are becoming 'Joe Average'.... with further drinking, over time, [& the drnking  does not have to be done, excessively] .... you will graduate to the 'Joe Tolerant' stage, where you will be very resilient to the affects of alcohol, which is a good thing.... for you be less likely to have a m.v. accident, or be raped, or be DWI'd. 

Nationwide, about 1.5 million drivers are arrested, annually , for DWI from alcohol or from drug intake, & this would amount to at least $37.5 million in DWI fines, but this deceiving, since many States tack on DWI/DUI Surcharges & other multiple fines to fatten up their State coffers.   DWI arrests & convictions are a Big Business for police.        

Although there are some good DWI defense attys, their numbers in  the USA are dwindling, by my courtroom observations, since merely  schmooooozing by 'defense' attys has increased greatly ,... an atty.  'skill', learnt in Law Schools.   

You can gain great insight, by my experiences/ observations in  going to courtrooms, all over the USA, for decades, now...& see how your courtcase case might well Be, greatly, Compromised from the beginning.  For you can be, easily, Victimized by what I call DWI/DUI 'Defense' Racketeering in the Legal Trade,  ...when, essentially, your 'defense' attorney can be equivalent to a 'mole' for the police, for the DA & for  the judge,... that is, he or she is/was on their side, & you were 'THE Most Expendable One', in the group !   YOU, MAY very well be A potential  Victim of Fraud & lawyer's incompetence, by your so called 'defense' atty, not wanting to really defend YOU.    Your DWI defense can then  be farcical ... & you have a good probability of observing your legal matter, just going through the "motions of a trial".  Where the so called 'defense' atty can be equivalent to a 'Pied Piper or  a mole, or a Shill for the Office of the DA', for  he can earn 'browny points' at YOUR expense for some other future courtroom case of his, by doing so, like defending a future  jay walking ticket.   This  can be done on & to you by a series or a litany of 'Conflict of Interests' AGAINST YOU... it could border on being criminal & is absolutely, highly UnEthical , when you paid someone, dearly & upfront, to defend you & he just wanted to go  through the motions of "defending" you...when actually, your atty. didn't, really, want to 'tick off ' his great friends: the cop, the DA, & the judge!  A partial solution is don't pay him the full stipend, upfront... there is, absolutely, nothing wrong in paying him, half at the end , after you been satisfied,... AND he should be able to  give you, specifically, in writing, at the beginning, his complete, defensive strategy on how he is going to he is going to win your case... and have him be definitive & on how 'viable' your case is,... after the police discovery on you has been examined,& , very specifically, HOW he is going to 'Win' your DWI case... actually, pay no $ to him or her, until this was done.    This will prevent him or her from forcing you to plead 'GUILTY', once,...  you are in the court house, on the appointed trial date, which happens often enough!   

Law schools indoctrinate them, ALL, on how to be 'State Collaborators', & how to go thru the "motions of defending" ...,& don't really spend anytime on really defending DWI, alcohol or drugs....then, they come out of law schools, ill-prepared, aka incompetent, but very skilled on how to 'schmooooze', & they want, very willingly, to march, in step, with a political drumbeat .

When I started to appear in courtrooms, many decades ago , there were no Courthouse Security to go through in order to enter the bldg. .. judges' decisions were fair, = no real need to worry that someone will shoot the judge or the DA.    Now days, just about every courthouse has VERY tight entrance Security because judges switched to Semper Pro-Police decisions, &/or to Pro Government &/or to Pro-political decisions, in America. They are, now, very afraid, & rightfully so.   

My mission is to help you from getting RailRoaded for DWI/DUI alcohol or drugs, by the "political" police in US of A, when you were not impaired, nor intoxicated, when carstopped. 

Governments  can, easily, perpetrate A BIG political LIE, ...& The BIG GOVERNMENTAL HOAX or fairytale is that : "EveryBody is, absolutely, politically, drunk at a contrived 0.08% BAC level ",  BUT "Everyone" is NOT intoxicated at the 0.08% legal limit,... far from it.  Drinking alcoholic beverages has been TOO prevalent in the American society, for a long time, now ...at social & sporting events, holidays, in the military,& at high school/College/ University BEER BOOT CAMPs, etc., all over  the USA.   You've heard ...he or she  was l-e-g-a-l-l-y drunk, but not, actually, drunk.  Yes, it makes GREAT sense to MIS-Convict a person at some reading at or above 0.08% BAC Legal Limit, when he or she was not drunk, by what is highly organized political collusion & by the legal group/mob mentality & via their concocted/ invented,or adopted political pseudo-'science'!   Current governments are VERY hard strapped to get their hands on money .    They don't no longer care how they get it through over-taxation, or through excessive fines/ surcharges, or thru conviscation.    I have tested many CDL truck drivers, who were not drunk at their Legal Cut Off of 0.04% BAC, or at much higher BAC....underaged drinkers have a Legal CUT OFF or Limit at 0.01% or 0.02% BAC.... the problem is many will get, very easily, mis-convicted for this, when they were not drunk nor impaired. For you could, easily, have 19 year old, underaged US Marine, who can get mis-convicted for DWI/DUI fuzzy politics, when he was not drunk. This young seviceman, who may, soon, get killed in some foreign country, has to suffer an artificial  DWI/DUI mis-conviction in his OWN USA, when he may have been drinking alcoholic beverages all through high school & was quite tolerant, when he was carstopped. 

The highest blood case that I helped to win in a court room was 0.32% BAC.... the highest breath case was 0.35% BrAC.  

I had to laugh at, supposedly, a well known & well advertized DWI 'defense' atty. in Wilmington, DE, when he was, recently, pleading, 'Guilty', a client of his with a 0.087% BAC reading, & he is suppose to be one of the 'B-e-t-t-e-r' DWI 'defense' attys in DE!  I was not involved in this particular DE DWI case of his. I asked him: "if he would be more comfortable 'in defending' a 0.079% BAC  reading, when the DE Legal Limit is set at 0.080%?"  It just illustrates being ripped off by 'one's defense' atty.'s incompetence! 

My name is Prof. Stan Broskey….
I am a DEFENSIVE Forensic Scientist, which means by my own choice , I choose, forensically &  scientifically, to help DWI/ DUI defendants, in their courtroom alcohol or drug arrest problems. I do not do the opposite testimony for any DA, Prosecutor, or AG, by my own choice & one would loose credibility by doing the opposites. This can be done by the DA just by having a prior transcript of one's testimony. Would one be MORE credible by also doing the exact opposite testimony for DAs?   [I would have to say the exact, opposite testimony to please DAs.] No, in this country, we have Freedom of Choice in what one chooses to do.   The state's  "e-x-p-e-r-t" comes to BURY YOU, & NOT TO PRAISE YOU.  He or she is NOT a "NEUTRAL" PERSON, by any means of the word , neutral,...often, the 'defense' atty. ,very probably, does not want to challenge him, for by doing this, ...it might displeasure , his friends,  the judge &/or the DA &/or the cop.    When I worked for the NJ State Police, I was told  that if I helped out any defendant, in any way, in any NJ courtroom case, ...that  I would be, immediately, fired, period...   with NO Ands, Ifs, or Buts!        

The ONLY thing that YOU were Obliged-To-Do, is to provide: a breath sample {appreciable error[s] can be involved against you by breath},... OR a blood sample {appreciable error[s] can also be involved against you due to very simplistic Principles  adopted by the political police, DAs & the judges},... OR a urine sample [appreciable, uncompensated for error[s] can be involved against you in an urine assay], …if the policeman asked you for any of these bio-samples from you, ...by Law, you must comply or you will get politically punished or sanctioned with a 'REFUSAL'.     Also, another Great Hoax perpetuated by the State is that " We make no mistakes , & any error is insignificant".  You can bet that The System is BIASED against you with that kind of adopted  philosophy,    based on extreme simplifications which can,easily, trigger, many Mis-Convictions per year.   

Doing the police roadside Standard Field Sobriety Tests, SFSTs, were done ALL, VOLUNTARILY, on YOUR part…. it was best that YOU did NOT do them, for most drivers are apt to fail them,... even when they were TOTALLY Sober.   For example, you are not apt to do them, correctly, when you are under stress, scared, irritated/ irate, or because of  some health problem, or from other problem.   I can help you with your courtroom SFST & its DWI/DUI scientific/ forensic defense.  The police SFSTs are not based on REAL Science, but on mere political pseudo-'science'.  When a 'defense'  atty. has boasted to you that he is certified on the police SFSTs ... that, probably, means he is a proponent for its police use  &, probably, also a Certified Dumbass!  I see one Penna. DUI 'defense' atty,  who is boasting that two of his customers are breathtest device manufacturers ... that is nothing to boast about.... he takes $ from your enemy!!!  What a DUMB-ASS!   On whose side is he on?   Guess.

FORENSIC Toxicology is a study of how people react to their alcohol or drug intake.   The political police in the USA adopted SFSTs [road side tests],  which are based on mere politics via the US DOT, who invented these police roadside SFSTs to get the maximum number of DWI convictions or mis-convictions, per year.  Either one, they do not care. 

About the alleged, observed DWI/DUI symptom[s] that the police officer cited on you:  the cop has not spent one day, in a medical school,…. but he is allowed & encouraged ‘to play M.D.’ on you… more often than not, he will enumerate symptoms supposedly for DWI that can be attributed to a non-alcoholic or to a non-drug intake causation in you or due to truama from an accident.   Often, no videotape was used, even though the US DOT gave millions of $ to each State, so that their political police would use video-cameras.   Many cops don't want to use video-cameras in DWI carstops ... they just want to say you were 'drunk'.   The video may not show what he is testifying to is correct.   YOU are apt to be deprived of The Best Evidence, ...when the videotape was, deliberately, not taken, & therefore will  not help you in your courtroom DWI defense. The police badge does not confer 'sainthood' on the wearer, although the Pro Police judge, too often, believes that it is so!    THE System got MORE corrupt, when Extra $ was given to police for DWI arrests &/or convictions.

When cops, judges, DAs & defense attys or their  family members get DWI'd/ DUI'D.... they "will ALL cry like babies", & they want EVERY DWI/DUI defense in the book!    

If this was a motor vehicle accident, just the trauma involved in a vehicular crash can mislead a lot of police to cite you, wrongly, for DWI/DUI. A police officer in the US of A can get EXTRA, Incentive  money for his DWI/DUI arrests &/or convictions, & if he dwells on DWI arrests, he can double his police salary by doing so, even though DWI arrests are a normal poice function & extra $ for this should not be allowed, & YOU CAN easily GET easily 'VICTIMIZED' by this…. BEWARE!   If you are tolerant & are involved in a car accident, your %BAC MAY be only circumstantial to the accident, but the State is highly biased, when it acts, automatically, to pin the accident on you, when your alcohol intake ,probably, did not cause the accident & was only circumstantial to the accident due to your life long Acquired Tolerance.   BEWARE!   MADD is a political action Hate Group, ....the executives at MADD get high 6 figure pays & 'Cadillac' fringe benefit plans.    MADD would LOVE the Legal Limit to be lowered to 0.04%BAC,...  then, virtually, Everyone would be Mis-Convicted for DWI!   MANY Defense attys would LUV this, too , it would increase the calls to their law offices by, at lease, a 100%!!!

Due to this EXTRA, INCENTIVE $, the cop can be BIASED against you, from the Get-Go of your carstop, due to a  REAL modern day, potential 'Conflict of Interest'  [Extra $ for their DWI/DUI work]  to police, ...this extra $ is allowed to exist by the courts. Arresting drivers for DWI is a normal police function,comes with the cop's paycheck, so EXTRA $ for this can, easily, lead to a DWI Quota being in effect & a 'Conflict of Interest'.    In some states, , e.g. New Jersey, the NJ municipal judges [ who are ALL, politically, appointed; no NJ judge  is elected by the people] collects this EXTRA,  INCENTIVE DWI surcharge $, & it goes back to his police members as a reward or as Extra incentive payment! The NJ DWI 'defense' attys  have never complained about this extra $ to cops ... they have never complained about anything... don't want to rock the boat!  A type of collusion. 

The NJ State Commission on Drunken Driving cites two years where NJ had MORE than a 100% DWI conviction rate [109.0% & 111.1%] with other years in NJ, the DWI conviction rates in the 90 plus % levels.   Yet, the NJ Atty. General directed this Commission to install EXTRA, Incentive $ to NJ cops or troopers  for their NJ DWI arrests or convictions!  I have never been told by anyone else that their State had more than a 100% DWI conviction rate!!!
That NJ Atty. General was promoted to a NJ Supreme Ct. judgeship,... you know where no NJ DWI defendant has ever won his NJ DWI appeal!!!! 

Digital breathtest devices can be, easily, manipulated by the police to have a DWI/DUI quota in existence.
 
ALL breathtest devices are wrongly programmed by its manufacturer that 'Everybody is the politically Same', which is not true for armies of people,... to what has been known in Real Science, for centuries, now.  These, uncompensated, analytical errors can accumulate & Go Against YOU.   This will get you, easily, cited & mis-convicted  for DWI/DUI, when that was not so.  People can vary a lot.... governments  do not compensate for these normal, human variation[s] that, potentially, was or were in you, when they tested you.... also, breath test devices ALL operate, stupidly,  that 'Everybody is the Same' .... even 5th graders know that 'Everybody is NOT the Same'.     So, who is dumber than a 5th grader?   If a medical student said that "EVERYBODY is the SAME", he would be, very quickly, left out of medical school, for being dumber than Doo Doo!

Lawyers are  indoctrinated in law schools that the law is 'sacro-sanct', & the law to them becomes like a religion to them with the courts being 'their churches'... so, it is not surprising at all  that  DWI/DUI 'defense' attys don't like to 'rock the boat' ,  which is another 'Conflict of Intere$t' on their part.
In every scientific course that I took, the subject was complex , not simplex.   Law makes people all the same, ...a very, very simple solution for a mucho easy  mis-conviction.   When the State Simpletons make the legal solution simple, ...then, many millions of defendants will be mis-convicted, over this engineered over- simplicity , Each Year!

It is easy for those in the legal trade to adopt that "Everybody IS The Same"hokum ... 99% or more  of them, never had a difficult science course in their life!  Those taking courses to be in politics or in law, these Law  courses were what we called in the Science Department, as being  'Breeze' courses, nothing really difficult, ...these legal students could go to all of the school's extra curriculars, & I remember they were the 'Biggest Boozers on the Campus', & they should be v. familiar with the concept of people becoming very tolerant, with repeative drinks, over time...  that the human-being-is-a-very-complicated is absolutely foreign to them.   All are eager to sue a MD if the MD has made a mistake [but was it an actual 'mistake'?] ... but attys  can make  legal mistakes, all the time, & you will be hard at task to find one atty in the yellow pages, whose law business is set up to sue incompetent lawyers!  We are now talking about Legal Malpractice.... you have heard a lot about Medical Malpractice...but Legal Malpractice is, too often,  left to fester & exist.

The DWI Law states that "Everybody is intoxicated at 0.08% BAC".... by collusion, they have created this Governmental HOAX, or  Myth, or political Fairytale, or BIG LIE.    But this is not so ... many people are quite Tolerant by my observations &/or by my testing on them to their alcoholic beverage intake with 151 rum, over the last 4 decades, or tolerant by their repeated drug intake for their DWI defense.  Legions of drivers  had drunk, so often, [& one does not have to imbibe, excessively] over the years, ...due to this, that their  drinking does not affect them, anymore.  Or  others have taken a drug, so many times, that  it has little effect or no drug effect on them ...drug corporations  ought to be forced to give you back your $, if their drugs don't work on you.   Street drugs are less apt to work, due to the non-existence of any quality control in these drugs. 

Many jury members know the Principle that when you, repeatedly, take a drug ,.... it, often, has lessen drug effect or no effect on you.  In N.J., the politicos took away YOUR Right-to-Have-a-JURY...  instead the politicos established their judges  all to be politically appointed judges.... very similar what previously occurred in Nazi Germany or in Stalin's Russia.  What difference are many judges in the current USA from a former Soviet Commissar?  Many GIs died from all over NJ in overtaking Omaha Beach in Normady, France in WWII, these Jersey GIs, ... many did not get off one shot before they were slaughtered before getting on the beach... they ALL Died in Vain... for they died to get rid of a political system similar to what that exists & thrives in NJ!  There has never been a single NJ DWI case at  NJ's Appellate or Supreme Ct. level after about a 1/2 of million NJ DWI defendants have gone thru the NJ DWI Court "System", even when NJ had the very crude Drunkometer & they said it was 'reliable'!  The State of NJ has always WON its DWI cases!  The very same can be said about the NJ GIs that died in Korea, Vietnam, Desert Storm & in Afghanistan... They, ALL, Died in Vain!   The Gestapo ALWAYS won in their Nazi courtrooms.... they never lost!    State courts in the USA, predominantly, rule in favor of their  precious police!  They are apt to be PRO-Police. The System is & has been, politically, fixed. 
The Judicial System[S] have been, politically, FIXED.

Then, there was the DWI carstop in Newark, NJ by two NJ State Police troopers on a US serviceman, who protested the carstop.  One NJSP trooper killed him & the other NJSP trooper tried to cover up this killing....no NJ court would take the case...it had to go to Federal Court in Trenton,NJ, where the jury found these two NJ State Police troopers GUILTY, & they were sent to Ft. Leavenworth Federal  Prison. Even the NJ State Police Colonel at the time thought that this murder of a US serviceman was justified!!!!

Under stress, one can say, TOO much, to the officer; not realizing that it is your U.S. Right to KEEP Quiet.  The only thing you had to do was to identify yourself, period .  Under these stressful carstop circumstances , you were very apt to say or do something wrong.   Too many, carstoppees volunteer too much, & after  this has been done, the cop will, then, apt to tell you that you have a 'Right to Keep Quiet' !   Whereas, this should have been done in the very beginning of the carstop.  When a cop carstops you, he is apt not to be your 'friend'.

About allowing yourself to be examined by a police Drug Recognition "E-x-p-e-r-t": a DR"E", which can easily lead to YOU being Mis-cited/Mis-convicted & VICTIMIZED by this  for DWI/DUI Drug Use, when it was NOT so.  It would have been better for your courtroom case that you did NOT cooperate with the DR'E'… the DR'E' is NOT a scientist by any stretch of one's imagination,... he is NOT a medical expert…he is only a policeman with a 54 hour course on how to implicate you on drug use, ...he has no REAL background in either science, nor in medicine.... he is a pseudo-'scientist'. The only thing that you have to do is provide him with a urine, & a breath test sample to avoid a political REFUSAL.  It would have been better to not answer any of his questions .  Refuse to cooperate with this pseudo-'scientist'.   
However, IF you did allow him to "medically" exam you, I can still help you out, forensically & scientifically,  with your anti-DR'E' defense.    A DR'E' can get EXTRA, INCENTIVE  $ for his drug arrests/convictions, which could, very well, be another  REAL, modern day  'Conflict of Interest'...So, BEWARE!   Don't get DR'E' Courtroom VICTIMIZED.

My e-mail box is drsjb@verizon.net

Prof. Stan Broskey, DEFENSIVE FORENSIC SCIENTIST... This 2010 is MY 52nd YEAR, doing what I do, as a bio-analytical-scientist. 

NOTEWELL: Written Statements by me , above, were ALL protected by my US Freedom of Speech, entitled to any US citizen.  I am a US citizen.  You will have to prove that I am not a US citizen.  Former US V.Pres. Al Gore  in talking about the warming up of the global environment, he says that knowledgeable scientists should speak up.... the same applies to anything else.