WELCOME to my website,... this website information is provided here for any DWI/DUI Defendant.    My name is Prof. Stan Broskey….I am a DEFENSIVE Forensic Scientist, which means that I, scientifically, help DWI/ DUI defendants, who are apt to be The UnderDogs in any courtroom.    Would Everybody be, ACTUALLY, impaired or intoxicated at the Legal Limit of 0.08%? Definitely No, due to one's lifelong Acquired Tolerance to alcohol &/or drugs , many would not be, actually, impaired nor intoxicated. The Law makes it super simple or v. easy  to Mis-convict you.   The DWI Law does not actually reflect what occurs in humans.   Many car drivers would not be impaired at 0.08%...many truck drivers would not be impaired at 0.04%, nor would a lot of underaged drivers be impaired nor intoxicated at 0.01 or 0.02% BAC, due to acquired tolerance.  

The ONLY thing that YOU were Obliged-To-Do, is to provide: a breath sample [Appreciable Error[s] can be involved],... OR a blood sample [Appreciable Error can be involved],... OR a urine sample [Appreciable Error[s] can be involved], …IF the policeman asks you for any of these bio-samples from you.

Doing the roadside Standard Field Sobriety Tests, SFSTs, were done all, VOLUNTARILY, on YOUR part…. it was best that YOU did NOT do them, for most drivers are apt to fail them, even when they were TOTALLY Sober. For example, you are not apt to do them, correctly, when you are under Stress, &/or because of  some health problem, &/or from previous  body problem[s],... & a DWI/ DUI carstop can be a very stressful situation for a lot of drivers.    I can help you with your SFST & DWI/DUI scientific/ forensic defense.   FORENSIC Toxicology is a study of how people react to DWI/DUI alcohol or drugs.

On the observed DWI/DUI symptom[s] that the police officer cited on you… the cop has not spent one day in a medical school,…. he is allowed ‘to play MD’ on you… more often than not, he will enumerate symptoms for DWI that can be attributed to non-alcoholic or to non-drug intake causations in you. If this was a motor vehicle accident, the trauma involved in a vehicular crash can mislead a lot of police to cite you, wrongly, for DWI/DUI. A police officer in the US of A can get EXTRA money for his DWI/DUI arrests or convictions…. BEWARE. Due to this Extra INCENTIVE $, he can be BIASED against you, from the get-go of the carstop.   Breath test devices can be easily manipulated.  The US DOT will count your mv accident, as alcohol related, if your %BAC was even 0.01% = not credible data.

Many carstoppees, under stress, say, TOO much, to the officer; not realizing it is YOUR U.S. Right to Keep Quiet.  The only thing you have to do is to identify yourself.

About allowing yourself to be examined by a Drug Recognition "E-x-p-e-r-t", a DR"E", can easily lead to you being Mis-cited/Mis-convicted  for DWI/DUI Drug Use, when it was NOT so.  It would have been better for your courtroom case that you did NOT cooperate with the DR'E'… the DR'E' is NOT a scientist, he is NOT a medical expert…he is only a policeman with a 54 hour course on how to implicate you on drug use. The only thing that you have to do is provide him with a urine, or a breath test sample. Don’t answer any of his questions at all … Do NOT allow him to examine you. Refuse to cooperate with this pseudo-scientist/ pseudo-intellecutal. However, IF you did allow him to exam you, I can still help you out with your anti-DR'E' defense. 

My e-mail box is drsjb@localnet.com      Prof. Stan Broskey, DEFENSIVE FORENSIC SCIENTIST... This is MY 50th YEAR, doing what I do, as a scientist.